Upholding the Sanctity of Life: The Constitutional and Moral Imperative Against Abortion
Natural law supports the nurturing of new life. Humans are the only species that goes against that natural order.
“The dens of lions and nurseries of wolves know no such cruelty as this: these savage inhabitants of the desert obey God and nature in being tender and careful of their offspring: they will hunt, watch, fight, and almost starve for the preservation of their young; never part with them; never forsake them, till they are able to shift for themselves.” Locke, Treat. 1, 44, 56.
The debate surrounding abortion is a deeply polarizing issue, touching upon fundamental questions of life, liberty, and morality. At its core, this debate addresses whether the termination of a developing human life can be justified by personal beliefs or legislative authority. To understand why abortion is fundamentally unlawful, it is essential to examine the principles of divine law, natural justice, and constitutional protections that underpin our legal and moral frameworks.
Our nation’s legal foundation is deeply rooted in divine law, which asserts that certain principles are immutable and universal. The framers of the U.S. Constitution and early colonial charters were guided by these principles, seeking to establish a legal system that aligns with the inherent dignity and rights bestowed by a higher authority. This perspective is encapsulated in the maxim, “Things which are forbidden by the nature of things are confirmed by no law,” which implies that laws contradicting natural law lack legitimacy.
The Constitution of the United States is a beacon of liberty and justice, enshrining protections that reflect these divine and natural principles. Specifically, the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. This constitutional protection extends to all individuals, including the unborn. By safeguarding the right to life from conception, the Constitution affirms that no legislative body or individual has the authority to override this fundamental right.
Recent revelations have exposed troubling practices related to abortion, highlighting the commercialization of fetal remains for profit. Reports have shown that companies like Senomyx have used aborted fetal cell lines, such as HEK-293 cells, in research and product development. This exploitation of human remains raises significant ethical concerns about the sanctity of life and the morality of treating human tissue as a commodity. The maxim, “He who is in the womb is considered as born, whenever his benefit is concerned,” reinforces the notion that the unborn have inherent rights deserving of protection and respect.
In the broader context, the ethical and legal arguments against abortion are not merely about personal choice or legislative authority. They are rooted in a commitment to uphold the principles of divine law and natural justice that form the bedrock of our legal system. The sanctity of life, as protected by constitutional and moral standards, requires a steadfast defense of the rights of all individuals, including those who are yet to be born.
John Locke’s observations resonate deeply here. He noted how even the most ferocious beasts protect their offspring, obeying the laws of nature. Locke’s insights remind us that protecting life, especially the vulnerable and unborn, is a universal imperative rooted in natural law. The act of abortion, therefore, stands in stark violation of these natural laws and principles.
The debate over abortion is a profound reflection of our values and principles as a society. It challenges us to consider the extent to which we are willing to uphold the fundamental rights and dignity of every individual, regardless of their stage of development. By returning to the immutable laws of nature and divine principles, we reaffirm our commitment to justice and liberty for all, ensuring that the sanctity of life is honored and protected.
As we navigate this complex issue, it is crucial to remember that the principles of natural law and constitutional protections are not subject to change by legislative or personal preference. They represent the enduring foundation upon which our society is built, guiding us to protect and respect the inherent rights of every individual from conception to natural death.
About the Author: Ron Bouchard is a co-founder of WeThePeople2.us, an educational and motivational resource dedicated to advancing knowledge about history, common law, and freedom advocacy. As a learned student of history and a sought-after authority on strategic intervention, Bouchard provides insightful analysis and guidance on legal and moral issues, including the sanctity of life.
Call to Action: To learn more about the ethical and legal arguments against abortion and how you can take action to notify legislators about why abortion violates natural law and is therefore unconstitutional, please visit WeThePeople2.us or download the notice at Lawful-Notification-Preventing-Maladministration-and-Halting-Unlawful-Sanctioning-of-Murderous-Practices-Witness-Template-1. Your voice can make a difference in upholding the principles of justice and protecting the sanctity of life.
