COMMON LAW ACADEMY RED
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.wethepeople2.us/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Common-Law-Academy-Discussion-Logo-copy.png?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1)
Law and Discourse Series
Today, we embark on a new path with the ‘Law and Discourse’ series (red). This series is designed to be more interactive and solution-oriented. While the ‘Fundamental Principles’ series (green) was about learning the law, ‘Law and Discourse’ is about applying that knowledge. Together, we will use what we have learned to identify instances where government actions need correction. More importantly, you will actively participate in creating and executing plans to address these issues.
Our sessions will be dynamic, involving discussions, breakout groups, and expert panels. We will work collaboratively to develop actionable solutions and strategies. Your insights, experiences, and ideas will be invaluable as we navigate through these discussions.
Thank you for joining us on this new venture. Let’s get started on making a real impact!”
WEDNESDAYS
7:00 PM EST
meetn.com/cla
Or, dial this U.S. number
+1-540-202-2235 PIN:27892
p.s. International dial-in numbers are available at https://meetn.com/Numbers
Meetn® is the Faster, Easier, and More Customizable Alternative to Zoom®
Lesson 101: Authority Under Scrutiny-People v. Government
In today’s Law and Discourse Discussion we tackle these two questions:
1. Thomas Massie Asked U.S. Attorney General, Merrick Garland, “By What Authority was Jack Smith appointed as Independent Counsel or “By What Authority was the office created?”
What is the answer?
and
2. All of mankind are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, in the manner and season most agreeable to the dictates of his/her own conscience?
Who gets to question your conscience? Is conscience limited to religious conscience?
Lesson 102: "Liberty of Conscience" and the Protection of Children
In today’s Law and Discourse Discussion we tackle these three questions:
1.Who has the right to “liberty of conscience” in America?
2. Is it unconstitutional to promote and condone LGBTQ+ ideologies in school?
3. Marjorie Taylor Greene introduced bill H.R. 1399- “Protect Children’s Innocence Act”. Why is the bill defective?
Episode 103: The Seismic Shift: The Supreme Court's Recent Rulings and Declaration of Incapacity to the President
In today’s Law and Discourse Discussion we tackle these three questions:
- How does SEC v. Jarkesy and the weakening of the Chevron doctrine affect administrative proceedings?
- In Trump v. United States the court ruled that sitting presidents could be shielded from certain legal actions related to their official duties. Which, many people argue allows presidents to act with impunity. Are they right?
- During the presidential debate on June 27, Biden’s cognitive decline was undeniable evident Proving to all who watched, his unfitness for the presidency. What can be done about it?
Lesson 104: Chaos in America
In this week’s episode, we delve into the escalating turmoil across the United States, tackling the pressing question: Will we survive the chaos in America?
1. The Political Landscape: Can Kamala Harris Become President?With increasing speculation about President Biden’s whereabouts, we explore the constitutional provisions and political scenarios that could see Vice President Kamala Harris ascend to the presidency. We also discuss the implications of such a transition for the country’s future.
2. Where is America? A Look at Law and Order Amidst Insurrection Claims
As accusations of insurrection and civil unrest dominate the headlines, we question what true insurrection looks like and the current state of law and order in America. Is the country heading towards unprecedented instability, or is there a path to restore calm?
3. Sour VINDICATION: Public Health Measures Under Scrutiny
We examine a groundbreaking study that reveals a startling conclusion: it was not the virus itself, but rather the public health measures implemented during the pandemic, that significantly contributed to increased mortality rates. This segment sheds light on the controversial policies and their impact on public health, challenging the narratives we’ve been fed over the past years.
Join us as we unpack these critical issues, offering insights and perspectives on the current state of the nation and what lies ahead.
Episode 105: By What Authority? Examining Government Overreach in Climate, Arms, and Commerce
We’ll explore how propaganda plays a role in shaping public perception of climate change, the uncritical trust placed in agencies without sufficient scrutiny, and the declared strategies of climate alarmists. The episode shifts the debate from whether climate change is occurring to a critical question: Does the government possess the authority to regulate or legislate on climate-related matters?
Additionally, we’ll assess whether Representative Lauren Boebert’s amendment, aimed at reducing the salaries of Biden administration officials in agencies like the EPA, is a sufficient measure. We’ll also discuss Thomas Massie’s leadership in a House Judiciary Committee hearing on ESG and climate change, examining the implications of these developments.
Episode 106: Guarding the Rule of Law in Turbulent Times
In this episode, we explore:
1. Legislative Overreach and the persistent unlawful actions by legislators attempting to pass ultra vires legislation.
2. We also examine Communism in America and how it is unlawful and wholly inconsistent with our Republican Form of government.
3. Kamala Harris’s Presidential Ineligibility and the controversy surrounding the distinction, “Natural Born Citizen.”
4. Finally , we will share one of our recent triumphs, the defeat the SAPHE 2.0 Bill in Massachusetts.
Episode 107: Education as Social Control: Unveiling the Sociological Forces of Indoctrination in American Schools
In this episode we will explore:
- Were Schools Created to Teach or Indoctrinate? The History of Compulsory Education in America.
- Does the Vermont Supreme Court’s ruling that allows vaccination of children without parental consent represent a legitimate exercise of government authority, or does it constitute an unconstitutional usurpation of power that violates fundamental individual rights? What can you do to protect your son or daughter?
When you sign enrollment documents in school, what exactly are you agreeing to?
How will the recent federal court ruling halting the Biden administration’s Title IX changes impact the rights of students and the enforcement of policies across different states, especially in the context of the ongoing political and legal battles over gender identity and free speech in schools?